Gilad Atzmon interviewed by Alimuddin Usmani
Alimuddin Usmani: Following the victory speech by Nigel Farage, you wrote on your Facebook wall: “It is easy to grasp why British workers support Farage and not the Labour Party.”
Can you explain this further?
Gilad Atzmon: Farage’s ideas are coherent and consistent. They reflect the feelings of the poor, the oppressed and the working people who have been reduced into a workless class. Whether Farage can help them is an open question but he offers a clear vision of change fuelled by nostalgic glory and a strong sense of belonging.
Corbyn, on the other hand, has little to offer although this is not entirely his fault. The Labour philosophy is full of contradictions and holes. On the one hand, Corbyn and Labour claim to represent the worker and the poor. But Corbyn and his party also subscribe to cultural Marxist and cosmopolitan ideas that advocate immigration, diversity, identitarian politics and various measures of ‘correctness.’ One cannot support the worker while simultaneously advocating immigration that puts local jobs at risk.
In the aftermath of Brexit, Farage talked directly to British workers about a new future and the prospects for renewal of manufacturing and housing. At the same time, Corbyn was holding forth in support of refugees and against racism. Important topics; but not immediately relevant to those out of work.
The next question is why this contradiction is embedded in Labour and Left politics. The Labour Party is:
1. dominated by Jewish cosmopolitan ideology; and
2. funded by Jewish oligarchs.
The Jewish Left is pro immigration, pro identitarian politics, pro LGBT and so on. Jews realize that when things turn sour, it is the working class that turns against the Jews. This causes them to feel threatened by a cohesive working class. They prefer the working class to be broken into an endless number of different sectarian and identity groups. Jews would prefer society to be seen as a manifold of tribes and synagogues. That way the Jews are just one tribe amongst many. It is the Jewish Left that taught us that ‘the personal is political.’ These are the same people that trained us to talk ‘as a’: ‘as a black,’ ‘as a Muslim,’ ‘as a gay, ‘as a Jew’ and so on. They have succeeded in dividing us.
Farage offered the Brits an opportunity to re-unite and think once again as Brits. At least 52% of the Brits bought into his call. His support included the vast majority of nonurban Brits who were apparently impervious to the Labour party’s contradictory position.
Alimuddin Usmani: Bernard-Henry Lévy labeled Brexit a strange defeat. He wrote that Brexit was a victory not of the people but of populism.
How would you respond to him?
To read BHL on Brexit click here
Gilad Atzmon: BHL’s post Brexit rant provides a window into Jewish fear and we should thank him for his willingness to share it with us.
To BHL true democracy, patriotism, nationalism, a united working class, manufacturing, coherence and truth are all symptoms of the Goyim’s resistance and must be suppressed.
BHL’s new evil Goyim are: Donald Trump, Putin and Nigel Farage whom he has now formally united with the Le Pens as the Hitlers of our time.
BHL’s rant attempts to conceal the fact that the Brits who oppose the EU are expressing frustration with mammonism.
Mammonism is a type of capitalism that is driven by financial transactions such as trade, banking and stock exchanges instead of by manufacturing. It is the exploitive capitalist agenda manipulated by the large financial institutions like Goldman Sachs and the financial speculators like Soros.
Brexit was effectively a vote against mammonism, against the banksters in the City and the global economy that left the worker with no prospect of a future. But the Brits who voted leave will probably not achieve what they intended. Boris Johnson, Michael Gove and Liam Fox who led the leave campaign are themselves servants of the Jewish Lobby and the global mammonites. Brexit was an attempt to divert examination from the City and its oligarchs and focus blame on Brussels. BHL is working hard to prolong this concealment project. He is suffocating us with his shallow liberal ideas and empty jargon and hoping to turn the goyim against themselves.
BHL, the pro war Zionist neocon who bears direct responsibility for the destruction of the lives of millions of Muslims, doesn’t like popular movements such as the Italian 5 Star or Podemos in Spain. He wants to keep the Goyim in the dark and let Soros’ ‘Open Society Institute’ fund their fake opposition.
“It is the victory of the mob of Fritz Lang’s Metropolis,” BHL writes. By ‘mob’ the Jewish ‘philosopher’ means hard working Goyim -- people who transcend sectarian politics in a search for unity. BHL should be clever enough to understand that such a craving ‘to be one’ was the driving force behind the Scottish referendum and the leave victory for Brexit. The cultural Marxist divisive agenda seems to have backfired.
In his rant, BHL can’t hide his goy hatred. He claims that half of the Brits who voted to leave the EU are “wreckers and dimwitted leftists, … drunken skinheads and hooligans, … illiterate rebels and bull-headed neo-nationalists.” Not exactly a flattering image delivered by the Jerusalemite thinker.
It has been established that the Jewish so called ‘intelligentsia’ claims credit for the enlightenment. BHL repeatedly follows that pattern. He claims to preach enlightenment values. In truth, Jewish thinkers contributed very little, if anything, to the enlightenment. Spinoza, the only Jew considered to be a prominent enlightening figure was excommunicated by his fellow Jews for being too enlightened. The Jewish so-called enlightenment (Haskalah) didn’t leave a single universal text. It basically taught Jews how to mimic the Goyim in the street while remaining Jews in their dwellings (be a Jew in your tent and a man on the street.)
If the enlightenment was actually the anthropocentric shift that led to the construction of popular individualism and is responsible for the birth of mass greed and consumerism, one would expect a ‘philosopher’ to grasp the growing disillusion with this endeavor. But BHL is not really a philosopher; he is a ‘Jewish philosopher.’ He specializes in populist pseudo intellectual harangue made up of an arbitrary collection of sound bites. Rather than producing enlightening content, BHL produces jargon. No one exhibits better than BHL that distinct dichotomy between Jerusalem and Athens. They are like oil and water. They can never mix. Accordingly a Jewish philosopher could be seen as a contradiction in terms. And indeed, those very few Jews who produced philosophy with universal values (Christ, Spinoza, Weininger and just a few others) are those who ended up in open dissent with their tribe.
Alimuddin Usmani: Alain Minc, French political advisor and author, born to a family of Jewish immigrants from Poland, wrote that Brexit is the victory of poorly educated people against well-educated people.
What is your opinion?
Gilad Atzmon: It is true that there was a demographic, socioeconomic, age and education split between the remain and leave supporters. In general, the rich voted to remain and the poor wanted to leave. The same was said about young and old. Some statistics point to an educational difference between the two sides. It is understandable that people who are less educated and likely to be limited to manual work would be the first to be affected by the collapse of manufacturing. It would be they who may see Brussels and the global economy as their enemy.
But here is the problem. Even if our society is partitioned by a cognitive barrier, the role of the ethical being is to care for the less able and less educated. Our duty is to make sure that all of us can earn a living and have a roof above our heads. I cannot see Labour and Corbyn with their Guardian supporters and Jewish funders leading such a move. In fact they didn’t. The Tories appear not to be aware that there is a problem.
Nigel Farage has unleashed a demon in Britain. But the movement extends beyond Britain or even Europe. The popularity of Trump, Sanders, NF and E&R (France) suggest that we are witnessing a global awareness of mammonism.
I also want to mention that the impression that all ‘leave’ supporters are less developed or educated is condescending and delusional. The Brexit debate revealed that some of the leave advocates were amongst the most sophisticated thinkers around. Many of them see the EU as a tool of the oligarchy and they are correct. They see leaving the EU as just the first step. The battle against mammonism is the big war ahead.
Alimuddin Usmani: An article published in Mondoweiss suggests that Israel should be deeply disturbed by the Brexit vote.
David Cameron and Tony Blair, true friends of Israel, have been shaken by Brexit. Do you think that Brexit could harm Israeli interests?
Gilad Atzmon: Not in the short run. The leading Brexiters are prominent British sabbos goyim. Fox, Gove and Johnson are servants of the Jewish lobby. However, in the long run Israel and Jews should be very worried. The Brexit is a clear sign of mammonism fatigue. When the Brits and the French and the Greeks and the Americans identify that their destruction is connected to Goldman Sachs, Soros and the Jewish Lobby we will see developments that could lead to global aggression on a catastrophic scale. We had been there more than once. I would have loved to avoid it if it had been possible.